TGMetricsАналитика Telegram
TGMetricsКрипто Telegram Groups › Vaulta

Vaulta Telegram Group

@vaultaGroupA · VaultaОтслеживается с 2026-09-06Данные на 2026-09-07
79Оценка доверия
Выглядит подлинным
средний confidence
Получить уведомления Открыть в Telegram
Члены
10,374
7д · 30д
Участники онлайн
217
2.1% of members
Сообщений в день
57.0
от последнего 600 messages
Подозреваемые клоны
0
имитирующие ручки не найдены

Участники и Участники онлайн За время

18 снимков с 2026-09-06
ЧленыУчастники онлайн

Первый день отслеживания. Обе линии заполняются с каждым ежедневным снимком.

Сигналы доверия

Выглядит подлинным 79

Confidence medium: based on 3,333 messages, 17 snapshots, tracked since today. Scores start at 60 and move with each signal; nothing scores 100.

  • 33 of 10,373 members posted this week, more than 85% of groups its size (+14)
  • 1.5% of members online, more than 36% of groups its size (-4)
  • Оценка спама 3: беседа в основном органична (+4)
  • Рост между снимками был плавным (+3)
  • История восходит на 7.8 лет (+4)

Активность постинга, 10 Weeks

Сообщения в неделю из собранной истории

3,335 messages over the period; the newest week may be partial.

A Цена

CoinGecko, 2026-09-07 06:30 UTC
$0.0807
+0.8% 24ч
+7.4%   30д +25.4%
Капитализация
$134.4M
объем за 24ч
$4.4M
С высокого, May 2025
-89.6%

Активность сообщества

Последние 7 дней из собранных сообщений
Активные участники
32
0.31% of 10,374 участников опубликовали
Сообщения
353
45% were replies
Топ 10 авторов
84%
из всех сообщений, a concentrated conversation
Доля спама
3%
посты ботов и повторяющиеся сообщения
Органические сообщения
59.1
в день, исключая спам
Посты ботов
2%
сообщений от ботов

Most of the conversation comes from a handful of accounts. Counts come from messages the collector has read so far; they grow as history accumulates. No individual member is identified or stored.

Ключевые факты

Handle@vaulta
ТипTelegram group
Члены10,374
Официальный дляVaulta (A)
A price$0.0807 +0.8%
Сообщений в день57.0
Участники онлайн217
Противоречия24 / 100
Оценка доверия79 / 100, выглядит подлинным, средний confidence
Похожие handle0
Отслеживается с2026-09-06

Пульс дискуссии

428 сообщений членов, последнее 7 days
Настроение участников74 / 100
Отрицательное31 positive, 11 отрицательные сообщения, оценка по списку словПоложительный
Противоречия24 / 100
Спокойно2 of 10 самые бурные темы — это споры, 3% complaintsНапряженный
Вопросы
10%
Жалобы
3%
Планы и события
10%
$EOS × 2ecfvaultavoteonlyeosdonpeoplemoney

Острые обмены

Потоки, подтвержденные рецензентом как споры, последний 7 days
Voting system fairness and personal conduct criticism · 2 replies, heat 5/10
Member AI'll put 10% of what I earn into a pool and distribute it to everyone who votes for me based on their stake weight. That sounds fair, right?
Member BIn reality you won't do that. Putting tokens into REX will give you more profit than using those to buy votes. Under the ecf proposed system, which is 1 person 1 vote, big token holders may more likely to abandon their tokens because their vote power got trimm
Member CHonestly I would never vote for you null you are a absolute death for vaulta ecosystem as you keep dividing the power instead of holding it together and pushing personal agendas instead of what’s actually true
Voting system design flaws and feasibility concerns · 2 replies, heat 4/10
Member AIt is, check the pinned message. But its one account, one vote. It's not proof of stake based. It's a heavily flawed system and they are living with their heads in the clouds.
Member B如果你是一名创业者,你一定不会成功。因为无论干什么都是不完美的,但重要的是你要坚持下去然后好好打磨。
Member CWas this a sentiment poll? I read through their bylaws which were proposing a weighted voting system...where did this 1 toke 1 vote come from?

Открытые сообщения из группы, показанные без имён. @Handles, ссылки и номера удалены.

Значок доверия

Для сайта проекта или закрепленного поста
TGMetrics trust badge for @vaulta

Значок обновляется вместе с оценкой и ссылается на эту страницу.

Активность группы

Часов от последнего 600 messages

Среднее значение в группе 57.0 сообщений в день, with 0.1 ответов на сообщение в среднем and 10% of messages getting at least one reply. 217 участников были онлайн при последней проверке, 2.1% of the group. Самые активные часы — 16:00, 17:00, 18:00 UTC.

00:0023:00 UTC

Управляете этим сообществом?

Заявить права через бота

Администраторы могут проверить право собственности менее чем за минуту: попросите @tgmetbot для кода, разместите его в сообществе, и страница получит отметку проверки. Проверенные администраторы получают оповещения о клонах, притоке участников, движениях цены и спорах автоматически.

Claim @vaulta

О чём обсуждают члены

1-day brief, 2026-09-06

A member posted an extended philosophical analysis of Vaulta's architecture, arguing that its permissions, RAM, BankingOS and AI agent infrastructure form a unified system for machine-economic actors rather than competing separately. The post sparked discussion about governance legitimacy, token economics, exchange delistings, and platform development, with members debating the merits of the vision and raising operational concerns about liquidity and cross-chain connectivity.

Члены обсуждают:

  • 1DEX holding USDT withdrawals with poor customer support communication
  • XSAT delisted from Coinex, now only on 1DEX which lacks liquidity
  • Bridged token quality depends entirely on backing company reputation
  • Possibility of listing XSAT on BitShares DEX for DPOS ecosystem support
  • On-chain comment system being developed for proposal discussions

О чем спорят участники:

  • One member questioned whether the long architectural post was AI-generated, and the author clarified it was their own thinking summarized by AI due to language barriers—resolved amicably with appreciation for the analysis.
  • Tension between theoretical architectural superiority and practical operational problems: members acknowledged the vision's merit while expressing skepticism about whether 2-week fixes actually materialize and whether bridged asset infrastructure can be relied upon.

Настроение: Intellectually engaged but wary about execution; frustrated with exchange and liquidity issues

Заявки: Vaulta's account and permission architecture was built around programmable authority · BankingOS, RWA and stablecoin infrastructure potentially complete an autonomous agent architecture · VaultRAM/$V creates an explicit economic resource through persistent state demand · EOS³ provides action layer combining compute, knowledge and authority · Huaqiang said exSat needs fixing with ~2 week timescale

AI agents and autonomous economicsArchitecture and permissionsGovernance and trustToken liquidity and delistingsBankingOS and RWABlockchain comparisons
Настроение
45% positive

About Vaulta

Написано из данных, 2026-09-07

Vaulta is a smart contract platform and layer-one blockchain where members of the @vaulta Telegram group discuss technical architecture, governance, tokenomics and the project's broader vision. The tone is mostly positive but contains some disagreement, particularly around governance decisions and voting system fairness.

Members engage in substantive technical discussions about how Vaulta's permission systems, RAM resource model, and proposed banking infrastructure might position it for autonomous agents and institutional use. Conversations also touch on exchange availability, token listings, and practical questions about the ecosystem. The group attracts people interested in blockchain architecture, DeFi infrastructure, and governance design rather than short-term speculation.

Что публикуется. Members post technical analysis of Vaulta's architecture and how its components might work together, governance concerns and voting fairness questions, exchange and liquidity issues affecting the token, and reminders to stay on-topic when conversations drift. Discussion includes substantive architectural comparisons with other blockchains, questions about token availability in certain regions, and occasional off-topic exchanges that moderators address.

Для кого это. The group is most valuable for people interested in understanding Vaulta's architectural decisions, participating in governance discussions, and staying informed about ecosystem developments. It is less suitable for those seeking price analysis, trading tips, or quick answers unrelated to the project itself.

Основные выводы

  • The community values technical depth and architectural reasoning over hype, with members engaging in multi-part discussions about systems design and long-term positioning rather than price movements.
  • Governance legitimacy and community trust are recurring concerns, particularly around voting fairness, resource allocation decisions, and whether important decisions can be independently verified.
  • Members distinguish between Vaulta's potential infrastructure role for autonomous economic actors and the need to measure value through actual resource demand and usage rather than narrative alone.
  • The group has little spam and enforces topic boundaries, suggesting active moderation and a commitment to signal-to-noise ratio.

Перед присоединением

  • Direct message solicitation and referral-based pitches have appeared in the group; members should be cautious of unsolicited offers from other users.
  • Members discuss governance controversies, but conversations sometimes mix verified facts with speculation; claims require evidence beyond transaction paths.
  • Exchange liquidity and availability remain fragile, with some bridged tokens experiencing withdrawal delays and recent delistings from major platforms affecting trading access.

Vaulta is a crypto Telegram group with 10,374 members, ranked 899 of 7,365 indexed communities by size and 596 among groups. It posts about 57.0 times a day. At the last check 217 members were online, 2.1% of the group. Its trust score is 79 of 100 (looks genuine). It is the community listed on CoinGecko for Vaulta (A), market cap rank 227.

Source: Telegram's public data for @vaulta, collected by TGMetrics. Figures as of 2026-09-07. See the методология.

Часто задаваемые вопросы

Is there an official Vaulta Telegram group?

Yes, @vaulta is the official Telegram group for the Vaulta community, where members discuss architecture, governance, and ecosystem developments.

Is the Vaulta Telegram legit?

The group appears genuine and has been running long-term with active moderation, little spam, and substantive technical discussion. It maintains focus on project-related topics.

What do people discuss in the Vaulta Telegram?

Members discuss Vaulta's technical architecture including permissions systems and RAM economics, governance decisions and voting fairness, exchange availability and liquidity, and comparisons with other blockchains.

Does Vaulta have Telegram support?

The @vaulta group is community-focused rather than a dedicated support channel; technical or account issues should be directed through official project support channels.

Where do Vaulta announcements get posted?

Major announcements typically appear in the @vaulta Telegram group, though members recommend checking official project channels and on-chain governance platforms for authoritative updates.

What is the Vaulta Telegram channel used for?

The group serves as a forum for technical discussion of Vaulta's architecture and vision, governance participation and voting feedback, ecosystem updates, and community conversation about the project's direction.

Is @vaulta the real Vaulta Telegram?

@vaulta is the official community group for Vaulta and has been established as a long-running, moderated space; always verify official handles through the project's primary website before sharing sensitive information.

Is @vaulta официальный Vaulta Telegram?

Yes. It is the Telegram community listed for Vaulta (A) on CoinGecko, market cap rank 227.

Как проверить официальную ссылку?

Откройте собственный веб-сайт проекта или его Листинг CoinGecko and follow the Telegram link from there. Official handles never ask for seed phrases or wallet connections in chat.

Как рассчитывается оценка доверия?

Every community starts at 60 and each signal moves it by a stated weight, measured against communities of similar size in this index. Groups are scored on how many members actually post, share online, spam share, join bursts, growth smoothness, and age. Thin data caps the score and lowers confidence; nothing scores 100.

Как часто это обновляется?

Количество членов снимается не менее ежедневно, ежечасно для активных каналов. Метрики постов пересчитываются через 1 час, 24 часа и 7 дней после публикации.