TGMetricsTelegram 分析
TGMetrics加密货币Telegram Groups › Vaulta

Vaulta Telegram Group

@vaultaGroupA · Vaulta跟踪自 2026-09-06数据截至 2026-09-07
79信任分数
看起来真实
中等 confidence
获取提醒 在Telegram中打开
成员
10,374
7天 · 30天
在线成员
217
2.1% of members
每日发帖数
57.0
自最后一次 600 messages
可疑克隆
0
未发现模仿账户

成员和 在线成员 随时间变化

18 快照自 2026-09-06
成员在线成员

跟踪的第一天。每次每日快照时两条线都会填充。

信任信号

看起来真实 79

Confidence medium: based on 3,333 messages, 17 snapshots, tracked since today. Scores start at 60 and move with each signal; nothing scores 100.

  • 33 of 10,373 members posted this week, more than 85% of groups its size (+14)
  • 1.5% of members online, more than 36% of groups its size (-4)
  • 垃圾分数3:对话主要是有机的 (+4)
  • 快照之间的增长一直很平稳 (+3)
  • 历史可追溯 7.8 年 (+4)

发布活动, 10 Weeks

从收集的历史数据中每周的消息

3,335 messages over the period; the newest week may be partial.

A 价格

CoinGecko, 2026-09-07 06:30 UTC
$0.0807
+0.8% 24小时
7天 +7.4%   30天 +25.4%
市值
$134.4M
24小时成交量
$4.4M
来自高, May 2025
-89.6%

社区活动

最近7天,来自收集的消息
活跃成员
32
0.31% of 10,374 个成员发布了
消息
353
45% were replies
前 10 名发帖者
84%
所有消息中, a concentrated conversation
垃圾信息比例
3%
机器人帖子和重复消息
有机消息
59.1
每天,不含垃圾消息
机器人文章
2%
来自机器人账号的消息

Most of the conversation comes from a handful of accounts. Counts come from messages the collector has read so far; they grow as history accumulates. No individual member is identified or stored.

关键事实

句柄@vaulta
类型Telegram group
成员10,374
官方的Vaulta (A)
A price$0.0807 +0.8%
每日发帖数57.0
在线成员217
争议24 / 100
信任分数79 / 100, 看起来真实, 中等 confidence
相似句柄0
跟踪自2026-09-06

讨论脉搏

428 成员消息,最后 7 days
成员情绪74 / 100
负面31 positive, 11 负面消息,词表评分正面
争议24 / 100
平静2 of 10 最活跃的讨论是争议, 3% complaints热烈的
问题
10%
投诉
3%
计划和活动
10%
$EOS × 2ecfvaultavoteonlyeosdonpeoplemoney

热烈交流

评论者确认为争议的讨论,最近 7 days
Voting system fairness and personal conduct criticism · 2 replies, heat 5/10
Member AI'll put 10% of what I earn into a pool and distribute it to everyone who votes for me based on their stake weight. That sounds fair, right?
Member BIn reality you won't do that. Putting tokens into REX will give you more profit than using those to buy votes. Under the ecf proposed system, which is 1 person 1 vote, big token holders may more likely to abandon their tokens because their vote power got trimm
Member CHonestly I would never vote for you null you are a absolute death for vaulta ecosystem as you keep dividing the power instead of holding it together and pushing personal agendas instead of what’s actually true
Voting system design flaws and feasibility concerns · 2 replies, heat 4/10
Member AIt is, check the pinned message. But its one account, one vote. It's not proof of stake based. It's a heavily flawed system and they are living with their heads in the clouds.
Member B如果你是一名创业者,你一定不会成功。因为无论干什么都是不完美的,但重要的是你要坚持下去然后好好打磨。
Member CWas this a sentiment poll? I read through their bylaws which were proposing a weighted voting system...where did this 1 toke 1 vote come from?

来自群组的公开消息,显示时不包含名称。处理掉了处理号、链接和数字。

信任徽章

用于项目网站或置顶帖子
TGMetrics trust badge for @vaulta

徽章会根据分数更新,并链接到此页面。

群组活动

距最后一次的小时数 600 messages

该组的平均值 57.0 每天消息数, with 0.1 每条消息的平均回复数 and 10% of messages getting at least one reply. 217 个成员在最后一次检查时在线, 2.1% of the group. 最繁忙的时间是 16:00, 17:00, 18:00 UTC.

00:0023:00 UTC

运营此社区?

在机器人中认领

管理员可以在一分钟内验证所有权:请求 @tgmetbot 获取代码,在社区中发布,页面获得验证标记。验证的管理员会自动获得克隆、成员跳跃、价格波动和争议的警报。

Claim @vaulta

成员在讨论什么

1-day brief, 2026-09-06

A member posted an extended philosophical analysis of Vaulta's architecture, arguing that its permissions, RAM, BankingOS and AI agent infrastructure form a unified system for machine-economic actors rather than competing separately. The post sparked discussion about governance legitimacy, token economics, exchange delistings, and platform development, with members debating the merits of the vision and raising operational concerns about liquidity and cross-chain connectivity.

成员正在讨论:

  • 1DEX holding USDT withdrawals with poor customer support communication
  • XSAT delisted from Coinex, now only on 1DEX which lacks liquidity
  • Bridged token quality depends entirely on backing company reputation
  • Possibility of listing XSAT on BitShares DEX for DPOS ecosystem support
  • On-chain comment system being developed for proposal discussions

成员在争论什么:

  • One member questioned whether the long architectural post was AI-generated, and the author clarified it was their own thinking summarized by AI due to language barriers—resolved amicably with appreciation for the analysis.
  • Tension between theoretical architectural superiority and practical operational problems: members acknowledged the vision's merit while expressing skepticism about whether 2-week fixes actually materialize and whether bridged asset infrastructure can be relied upon.

情绪: Intellectually engaged but wary about execution; frustrated with exchange and liquidity issues

认领: Vaulta's account and permission architecture was built around programmable authority · BankingOS, RWA and stablecoin infrastructure potentially complete an autonomous agent architecture · VaultRAM/$V creates an explicit economic resource through persistent state demand · EOS³ provides action layer combining compute, knowledge and authority · Huaqiang said exSat needs fixing with ~2 week timescale

AI agents and autonomous economicsArchitecture and permissionsGovernance and trustToken liquidity and delistingsBankingOS and RWABlockchain comparisons
情绪
45% positive

About Vaulta

根据数据编写, 2026-09-07

Vaulta is a smart contract platform and layer-one blockchain where members of the @vaulta Telegram group discuss technical architecture, governance, tokenomics and the project's broader vision. The tone is mostly positive but contains some disagreement, particularly around governance decisions and voting system fairness.

Members engage in substantive technical discussions about how Vaulta's permission systems, RAM resource model, and proposed banking infrastructure might position it for autonomous agents and institutional use. Conversations also touch on exchange availability, token listings, and practical questions about the ecosystem. The group attracts people interested in blockchain architecture, DeFi infrastructure, and governance design rather than short-term speculation.

发布什么内容。 Members post technical analysis of Vaulta's architecture and how its components might work together, governance concerns and voting fairness questions, exchange and liquidity issues affecting the token, and reminders to stay on-topic when conversations drift. Discussion includes substantive architectural comparisons with other blockchains, questions about token availability in certain regions, and occasional off-topic exchanges that moderators address.

这是为谁提供的。 The group is most valuable for people interested in understanding Vaulta's architectural decisions, participating in governance discussions, and staying informed about ecosystem developments. It is less suitable for those seeking price analysis, trading tips, or quick answers unrelated to the project itself.

主要要点

  • The community values technical depth and architectural reasoning over hype, with members engaging in multi-part discussions about systems design and long-term positioning rather than price movements.
  • Governance legitimacy and community trust are recurring concerns, particularly around voting fairness, resource allocation decisions, and whether important decisions can be independently verified.
  • Members distinguish between Vaulta's potential infrastructure role for autonomous economic actors and the need to measure value through actual resource demand and usage rather than narrative alone.
  • The group has little spam and enforces topic boundaries, suggesting active moderation and a commitment to signal-to-noise ratio.

加入前

  • Direct message solicitation and referral-based pitches have appeared in the group; members should be cautious of unsolicited offers from other users.
  • Members discuss governance controversies, but conversations sometimes mix verified facts with speculation; claims require evidence beyond transaction paths.
  • Exchange liquidity and availability remain fragile, with some bridged tokens experiencing withdrawal delays and recent delistings from major platforms affecting trading access.

Vaulta is a crypto Telegram group with 10,374 members, ranked 899 of 7,365 indexed communities by size and 596 among groups. It posts about 57.0 times a day. At the last check 217 members were online, 2.1% of the group. Its trust score is 79 of 100 (looks genuine). It is the community listed on CoinGecko for Vaulta (A), market cap rank 227.

Source: Telegram's public data for @vaulta, collected by TGMetrics. Figures as of 2026-09-07. See the 方法论.

常见问题

Is there an official Vaulta Telegram group?

Yes, @vaulta is the official Telegram group for the Vaulta community, where members discuss architecture, governance, and ecosystem developments.

Is the Vaulta Telegram legit?

The group appears genuine and has been running long-term with active moderation, little spam, and substantive technical discussion. It maintains focus on project-related topics.

What do people discuss in the Vaulta Telegram?

Members discuss Vaulta's technical architecture including permissions systems and RAM economics, governance decisions and voting fairness, exchange availability and liquidity, and comparisons with other blockchains.

Does Vaulta have Telegram support?

The @vaulta group is community-focused rather than a dedicated support channel; technical or account issues should be directed through official project support channels.

Where do Vaulta announcements get posted?

Major announcements typically appear in the @vaulta Telegram group, though members recommend checking official project channels and on-chain governance platforms for authoritative updates.

What is the Vaulta Telegram channel used for?

The group serves as a forum for technical discussion of Vaulta's architecture and vision, governance participation and voting feedback, ecosystem updates, and community conversation about the project's direction.

Is @vaulta the real Vaulta Telegram?

@vaulta is the official community group for Vaulta and has been established as a long-running, moderated space; always verify official handles through the project's primary website before sharing sensitive information.

Is @vaulta 官方 Vaulta Telegram?

Yes. It is the Telegram community listed for Vaulta (A) on CoinGecko, market cap rank 227.

我如何验证官方链接?

打开项目自己的网站 或其 CoinGecko 列表 and follow the Telegram link from there. Official handles never ask for seed phrases or wallet connections in chat.

信任分数如何计算?

Every community starts at 60 and each signal moves it by a stated weight, measured against communities of similar size in this index. Groups are scored on how many members actually post, share online, spam share, join bursts, growth smoothness, and age. Thin data caps the score and lowers confidence; nothing scores 100.

多久更新一次?

成员数至少每天快照一次,活跃频道则每小时快照一次。发布指标在发布后1小时、24小时和7天时重新读取。